View Single Post
Old 03-07-2021, 08:53 PM   #130
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeera View Post
The most cursory look at recent banned and challenged books lists shows that it's predominantly conservatives and religious bigots objecting to books with LGBTQ+ content, antiracism content, *whispers* sex, and, erm, magic. With the strongest focus being on anything queer.

Dr. Seuss has been hit from both sides:

Quote:
“Green Eggs and Ham” was banned briefly in California in the early 90s when it was considered to involve a homosexual seduction plot. A California school district also pulled “The Lorax” by Dr. Seuss because of content that it believed made the forest industry appear criminal.
Same with J.K. Rowling.

I'm against book/eBook (and newspaper) suppression and self-censorship regardless of whether it is corporate or governmental, left or right. I guess we could discuss political motives over at the political forum, but in terms of a web board promoting Mobile Reading, I don't think motive is the big issue. The issue is, for me, freedom to read.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote