View Single Post
Old 03-06-2021, 09:52 PM   #94
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,438
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynx-lynx View Post
My point is though, would the discussion have taken place outside of the US by the copyright holders.
Legally, I think it could. As far as I know, copyright is everywhere considered to include the right of the copyright holder to withdraw publication rights.

The Seuss situation is a special example of self-censorship, comparable to that where an author avoids topics where his or her views would give offense to powerful others. And self-censorship is found in many nations.

Of course, the Seuss case isn't one where the author self-censors, but rather it is being done by his legatees. That has to be rare anywhere, because, until recently, an author's backlist almost always became uneconomical to keep in print long before copyright expired. With eBooks, and perhaps print on demand, that has changed.

Withdrawing eBooks, because the author's ideas generate outrage in succeeding generations, is something new. The U.S. may be first there, but I think will not be the last.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote