View Single Post
Old 02-24-2021, 01:15 AM   #7
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,784
Karma: 169712580
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siegfried View Post
Thanks for the responses.

I got the reports for each Epub (had to zip them to upload it here, so do tell me whether or not they unzip ok). The file with the Number 1 in the filename is the book from months ago (84 pages, 21 mb), and the one with the Number 2 is the newer one (64 pages, 29 mb). If these don't provide enough information, I will just send the entire files across.

If it really is because of the image file sizes, as far as compressing goes, I don't quite see why the file sizes would be this much larger even after I'd compressed them. No compressors I've used can shrink these images down any more than they already have been.
Basically, looking at your reports, one file (N2) has 14 files over 1MB while the other (N1) has 7 files over 1MB. The total file size for over 1MB files in N1 is 9365.05KB while in N2, they total 18826.16KB. So there is pretty much the file size difference. Since most image formats are already compressed fairly well, it's hard to reduce the file size without losing quality.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote