View Single Post
Old 02-09-2021, 10:11 PM   #11
Semwize
Guru
Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Semwize ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 914
Karma: 275656
Join Date: Jun 2016
Device: Kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB View Post
Over the years SanDisk and Samsung seem to have the best results in that area. I use CrystalDiskMark for these tests. See this message and this message for some images of the output.
The tests are certainly great, but ...

I've tried both Samsung (currently installed Samsung EVO Plus) and Sandisk Extreme pro, and other cards. And there are no visual differences in the speed of the book. Unless in the speed of transferring books from a computer (but this is not important for most, since not many people transfer 1000 books each, right?).

I to the fact that I would not bother with the speeds, I did not see any noticeable and tangible improvements when changing cards. Excluding the transfer rate to and from the computer. And I did not see that wrote about such improvements. Rare exceptions can be explained by the fact that the stock card was originally defective, this happens.

Last edited by Semwize; 02-15-2021 at 03:45 AM.
Semwize is offline   Reply With Quote