View Single Post
Old 01-11-2021, 01:57 PM   #283
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,973
Karma: 26738313
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Amazon did not have a monopoly. Sony was also selling eInk Readers and eBooks.
Sony did not have a huge share of the book selling business. In disputes against publishers, Amazon was known to pull ALL of a publisher's book from sale.

Monopoly isn't the useful term. Able to prevent free and fair competition - is a better concept.

Remember - a company isn't supposed to have to compete against itself. Amazon was using the publisher's products as loss leaders to launch its reading devices. Good for Amazon, bad for the publishers -- and frankly -- for the other book sellers who didn't have billions in VC money and inflated stock evaluations to run their businesses on.
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote