Thread: Thoughts on implementing a networked Calibre database
View Single Post
Old 01-04-2021, 05:34 AM   #5
ownedbycats
Custom User Title
ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ownedbycats ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ownedbycats's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,052
Karma: 75568269
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Libra H2O, formerly Aura HD
I saw a mention of hardlinking in the FAQ section about using a NAS:

Quote:
A filesystem is a complex beast. Most network filesystems lack various filesystem features that calibre uses. Some don’t support file locking, some don’t support hardlinking, some are just flaky.
Is hardlinking something Calibre uses, or just an example of how filesystems differ?
ownedbycats is offline   Reply With Quote