View Single Post
Old 01-03-2021, 03:14 AM   #73
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,082
Karma: 315558332
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Perhaps some references would be useful to the discussion of what is or is not legal.

In the USA, the relevant legislation is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
In Canada, it's the amended Copyright Act of 1985
In the UK it's the amended Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
In the EU it's the relevant national government implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of 22 May 2001.

In all these cases, circumvention of technological measures for personal use is a civil infringement, with many exceptions. The copyright holder would need to take the infringer to court, and show that none of the many exceptions applied, and (I think) that there were actual damages.

Ethically, I see nothing wrong in removing DRM for personal use.
pdurrant is offline