Quote:
|
The King James Bible is rip-off of the Old Testament as someone decided to add content in order to create a new religion.
|
I must say, I haven't heard the New Testament called "added content" before. At least you didn't call it "filler material". But when you called the older writings the Old Testament, you implied that there is a New Testament. Otherwise these writings would have just been called the Testament. I'm surprised that you trapped yourself like that. Tanakh might have been the better term for you to use. But the Tanakh and the Old Testament, while very similar for the most part, are not the same either - and they are interpreted differently (different emphasis) by their respective followers.
I guess I am more "well read" than I thought I was.