View Single Post
Old 12-14-2020, 04:47 PM   #10
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,796
Karma: 146391129
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea View Post
To me, "well read" is an old fashioned word, it's not natural for me to use it.

The first association I get when I hear it is Darcy talking about his criteria for an accomplished woman (and does "well read" require you to know who Darcy is, and which book by which author he appears in? Should a well read person recognize the quote and remember the gist of it?)

The second association I get is the recent discussion about canon in SF&F, and Jeanette Ng's acceptance speech for the Campbell award (and does "well read" require you to know what kind of books Ng writes? Or what she talked about in her speech? Or who Campbell was, and why the Campbell award was renamed?)
Do we have to actually like these "classics" to be well-read? I find reading Jane Austen to be something I will never do. I know about her and some of her books, but to actually read her books? Heck no!
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote