Nikkie came here for input to improve their platform not to catch grief for something she isn't able to change since she doesn't work in that area. She has already responded that, contrary to the statements above, they did get proof that the publisher does have the proper rights.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikkie
It looks like a report of fraud was investigated and proof of rights by this publisher was provided. (I have nothing to do with this part of our site, but was able to see that this was done.)
|
Maybe they were given something that is fraudulent but without seeing actual proof we have no way to tell. For something like this, I assume they had lawyers to review it that will have more knowledge than us.
I appreciate the zeal for this but, please!, give it a rest or take it to a thread that's supposed to be for this instead of side tracking this one. At this point, it is up to the actual rights holder or the author to continue to fight this. You've done what you can.
Can we get back to the original topic please?