Quote:
Originally Posted by deback
Again, this discussion has nothing to do with multiplication.
So, it seems that you are now agreeing with me about how omitting the text-indent rule will result in no indentation, as long as there are no other classes that would apply. If you include it with a zero value, there will be no indentation. If you include it with a number higher than zero, then there will be an indentation. Therefore, if you omit the text-indent rule, there will be no indentation, whether you include the "em" after the zero or not. I've had enough of this conversation, which has gone on way too long.
|
No, I am not agreeing with you. Resorting to ad hominem attacks, specious logic such as stating that 0 would not work followed by em, stating that 300 and 400 were somehow equal to 0, telling us the default for all rules is 0. Trying to change your position in almost every post does not help either. You might want to try reading your message to which this is a response as a fine example of meaningless noise. How exactly are we to include or exclude the em after the 0 in a non-existent rule?
Quote:
Originally Posted by deback
if you omit the text-indent rule, there will be no indentation, whether you include the "em" after the zero or not.
|
“To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead.”—Thomas Paine,
The American Crisis