Thread: CSS Question
View Single Post
Old 11-12-2020, 03:08 PM   #37
deback
Book E d i t o r
deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.deback ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 432
Karma: 288184
Join Date: May 2015
Device: Laptop
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
I've just done a test and your CSS code isn't going to work. I tried your article CSS code and it was a big failure with ADE 2.0.1. That means that you cannot use it because it's not backwards compatible. You have to test your code to see if it is backwards compatible. ADE 2.0.1 is the benchmark for backwards comparability. This is why I don't do things like that. I know my code is compatible.

You have to blame the companies who use RMSDK but have not kept it updated for your code failure.
The following line caused an error in Check Book:

margin: 0 1m 0 0.25em;

Should be:

margin: 0 1em 0 0.25em;
deback is offline   Reply With Quote