View Single Post
Old 11-05-2020, 06:37 AM   #221
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Question Mark View Post
Exactly, which is why I said "in keeping with your thoughts about the ingenuity of modern readers".

I was, in fact, agreeing with you on how modern readers will approach the "Classics" when forced to confront them. They will find an easier alternative.

However, an alternative like The Graphic Canon, as opposed to Coles Notes or some more modern study guide, might actually inspire some modern readers to go to the original source. Not most, but some.

I have met a good number of young students who know much more about Greek mythology than I do. Why? Not because they have been forced to take classes on Greek mythology for their edification because it underlies a lot of our "Classic" Literature. But rather because they got hooked on the Percy Jackson series which began with The Lightning Thief and they got intrigued.

If you want modern kids to read Shakespeare, I would suggest writing a series like Percy Jackson which makes extensive reference to Shakespeare's works. Then let kids discover Shakespeare on their own. They will likely embrace it more if it is something which they have sought out than if it has been mandated upon them.

Would every child actively discover Shakespeare in such a manner? Of course not. Probably not even the majority. But those that did would be more likely to embrace him and then pass on their enthusiasm and their knowledge to their peers. Students tend to be influenced by their peers much more than by the majority of their teachers.

Schools do no favours to Shakespeare, their students or society in general by mandating that his works be read in school. Students need to be able to read, think critically about what they have read and then express their considered opinions about what they have read both in written and oral format. That can be done with any number of texts. There is nothing magic about the "Classics" in this regard.

Offer the "Classics" for those so inclined. Mention them in historical reference to more modern texts when they touch upon a shared theme. But don't force them upon students for purposes of "edification" unless the intent is to turn students off of reading to ensure that they remain sheep, beholden to the sound bites and slogans which plague airwaves and pollute discourse.
At one time, it was generally accepted that a common culture was a good thing and that any well educated citizen was familiar with certain works. The purpose isn't to turn every student into a lover of Shakespeare, but rather to make sure that everyone who has reached a given level of education has enough exposure to it to be familiar with Shakespeare.

You seem to be making the argument that one should only study that which they find interesting at a given time. If you extrapolate that out to all subjects, then it's pretty obvious one gets poorly educated people using that method.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote