Quote:
Originally Posted by issybird
I think the obvious inference is that it is not worthwhile for the libraries concerned. At one point, I ran a few numbers and it seemed to me that libraries were significantly out of pocket when it came to heavy users of non-resident cards - and it seems likely that those who pay for a card are going to be heavy users. Why should Fairfax County taxpayers subsidize any out of area borrowers, unless it’s part of a quid pro quo?
TL; DR: If overseas borrowers were a net revenue source, why the heck would they cut them off?
|
If you're obvious inference is correct, and I have my doubts, then why didn't they cut these cards out years ago? Or increase their fees? Your assumption that users of non-resident cards are going to be heavy users is also doubtful, and certainly not correct in my case. It was more a question of options and convenience. Including being able to borrow in Kindle formats and not even having to consider ridiculous geographic restrictions. I suspect it is probably the latter that has lead to their decision, rather than any lack of financial viability.
I am interested to hear from others who use these cards. Perhaps this is more general than just a single library. And, of course, I would like to hear what other libraries continue to offer this service.