[NiLuJe]

Any constructive help making the Wiki more relevant is always appreciated. As you've noticed, I'm not generally a huge fan of third-party documentation, because it's often extremely roundabout, outdated, or just plain wrong, but I do acknowledge that the wiki format is helpful, and as far as the MR wiki is concerned, I do check from time to time that it's not recommending obviously crazy stuff.

But I no longer have the time/will to duplicate documentation in different places, so, what I consider canonical can mainly be found on the forums, or the embedded doc. And it *will* happily take shortcuts and resort to cross-references to make it slightly less gnarly to grok for newcomers, while the Wiki will try to deal with all corner-cases possible (of which there are *many*), which I don't personally find all that user-friendly (but not unhelpful).