View Single Post
Old 10-06-2020, 07:15 PM   #1
rem736
purpose priority passion
rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rem736 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 645
Karma: 9002000
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: socal, usa
Device: sony prs-350, b&n ngp, rM2, kindle scribe, boox poke5
comparing speed, efficiency, etc, in specs

does anyone else get annoyed when a manufacturer (such as apple) compare the speed of a new device with the same device of the previous generation and uses "2X faster" to describe the improvements?

here's the logic.

when they say 30% faster (or anything less than 100%), it is accurate. example, previous gen device runs at 100 MHz, new device runs at 130 Mhz. this is accurately described as 30% faster. translated to decimals, 30% is 0.30.
40% faster is 0.40, 50% is 0.50...99% is 0.99. so logically at 100% faster, it's 1.0 faster.

but then when a device is running at 200 MHz compared to something running at 100 MHz, they say it's 2X faster. what happened to 1X faster?
they can say twice as fast, but 2X faster is completely wrong.

Last edited by rem736; 10-06-2020 at 07:17 PM.
rem736 is offline   Reply With Quote