View Single Post
Old 10-01-2020, 02:58 PM   #104
the.Mtn.Man
Guru
the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.the.Mtn.Man ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
the.Mtn.Man's Avatar
 
Posts: 710
Karma: 2483502
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: Kobo Aura
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Robin View Post
I notice you conveniently avoided one key qualifier asked for in the post you quoted: "up-to-date".

The Webster's 1913 is anything but. The various varieties of English have changed so much in the last century that relying on such an antique makes little sense. Shift happens, words change their meaning, or connotation, and a century-old fossil won't show any of that. For those times when one simply MUST know the meaning of an obsolete word or archaicism, go online to the OED. Or, if antebellum is for some weird reason a must, the Webster's 1913 is also available online.
It depends on what you mean by "up-to-date". The Webster's 1913 is sufficiently up-to-date for most purposes.
the.Mtn.Man is offline   Reply With Quote