Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Robin
The fact that ONE (not "at least" one, only one) user claimed (wrongly) that they already had the new dictionaries is not proof of, or even suggestive of, ambiguity to me. Had there been many, or even simply several, of such posts then I might have considered the wording to have been unclear.
|
I didn’t claim that’s what suggested ambiguity, I claimed that’s what gave credence to the other possible interpretation of the ambiguously worded release notes, which I quoted earlier in the thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by twowheels
[...] I think we can see where the confusion comes from:
> We've updated 18 of our current dictionaries and added 4 new ones (as of October 1, 2020):
Does the parenthetical statement apply to the entire sentence, or just the portion after 'and'? We now know that it applies to the entire sentence, but it can be correctly interpreted either way.
It can be very easy to interpret that as ... "we've updated our 18 current ones (already), and added 4 new ones (available Oct 1)", which is how I initially read it.
|