View Single Post
Old 09-29-2020, 11:06 AM   #105
twowheels
Wizard
twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.twowheels ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
twowheels's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,854
Karma: 13432974
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: Kobo Clara HD, iPad Pro 10", iPhone 15 Pro, Boox Note Max
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Robin View Post
The fact that ONE (not "at least" one, only one) user claimed (wrongly) that they already had the new dictionaries is not proof of, or even suggestive of, ambiguity to me. Had there been many, or even simply several, of such posts then I might have considered the wording to have been unclear.
I didn’t claim that’s what suggested ambiguity, I claimed that’s what gave credence to the other possible interpretation of the ambiguously worded release notes, which I quoted earlier in the thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by twowheels

[...] I think we can see where the confusion comes from:

> We've updated 18 of our current dictionaries and added 4 new ones (as of October 1, 2020):

Does the parenthetical statement apply to the entire sentence, or just the portion after 'and'? We now know that it applies to the entire sentence, but it can be correctly interpreted either way.

It can be very easy to interpret that as ... "we've updated our 18 current ones (already), and added 4 new ones (available Oct 1)", which is how I initially read it.

Last edited by twowheels; 09-29-2020 at 11:09 AM.
twowheels is offline   Reply With Quote