View Single Post
Old 09-26-2020, 03:11 PM   #11
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,864
Karma: 169712582
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korn on the Kobo View Post
That’s tremendously insightful. From an electrical engineering perspective it sounds counterintuitive… so much more logical that Not to electrically charge a pigment cell for it to remain at the bottom layer is 100% more efficient powerwise than to charge the upper layer for it to float upwards… else the device would always be consuming power to keep the lower pigments on the lower layer which we know eink doesn’t. And from a chemical/materials science one that the white dye would make the screen look much whiter on the spectrum. Big thanks.
The word you are searching for is inertia. Until the display is acted upon by an external force, the pigments will stay where they are so no power needed to maintain the display.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote