View Single Post
Old 08-29-2020, 04:00 PM   #53
Sirtel
Grand Sorcerer
Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sirtel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Sirtel's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,643
Karma: 241656297
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Estonia
Device: Kobo Sage & Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop View Post
I went through something similar, though my classics of the time were primarily what I thought of as the Great Americans. I read almost everything Steinbeck wrote. And lots of Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald. I never truly warmed up to Hemingway. But I loved Fitzgerald and Steinbeck.

I do think you're missing out on something when you dismiss 'classics' as a genre. Poe's stories and The Grapes of Wrath are both classics. But that's about all they have in common.
It's not so much that I dismiss them as a genre, but that I no longer find myself attracted to older books. I prefer modern genre fiction these days. No idea why. It just is what it is and I see no reason to force myself to read something, now that I'm close to fifty. There isn't enough time to read everything I want to read, let alone things I don't want.

Btw, I didn't like Hemingway either. Don't really remember Steinbeck or Fitzgerald, although I certainly read a book from both, at the very least. Probably just felt meh. I tended to like romantics more than realists. Victor Hugo, Dumas, George Sand, sisters Bronte etc.
Sirtel is offline   Reply With Quote