View Single Post
Old 08-08-2020, 03:26 PM   #14
hobnail
Running with scissors
hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hobnail ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,590
Karma: 14328510
Join Date: Nov 2019
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillipgessert View Post
I think it’s ok to use blockquote for those things too, given that they are quotes from an outside source. Admittedly feels a little weird in conversation to “quote” a sign, but I think it does make some sense in a markup semantics context.
That's how I felt as well, and was using it that way. But Tex2002ans gives that the thumbs down. W3schools gives the following as an example usage: <blockquote cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html"> and I think that the cite usage is meant to be an indication that it should really be a direct quote from some other source. I'm ok with being semantically fussy and so I made my "block" class.

But it's sort of funny; when I rework a Project Gutenberg book; they'll have all of those things that I use my block class for, letters, poems, etc. in a div and sometimes the div is in a blockquote, but it all has double quotes around it. I've taken to removing them since it's set off with indentation and obviously a "quote."
hobnail is offline   Reply With Quote