Quote:
Originally Posted by mdp
Absolutely. Nate? ; )
Eh?! You see in there a loss of 9x ?! The loss below comparable to the loss above? No, I doubt that the fuzziness of the interpolated real photos could ever manage to hide a resolution loss 300→100, which is the one I showed with the "This is a string text". Maybe an equivalence of 300→173 I could consider possible. It is true that blurriness can conceal everything, but to make 300 and 100 similar I think it would have also annihilated the tinted filter texture.
Anyway: if we got better photos there would be no need to wonder and reconstruct.
|
Yes. Different sizes. Your b/w example has text much smaller than the kaleido example. Make it fuzzy, and the difference will be smaller. Zoom in on the fuzzy one. Take the "o" and compare black vs red "o" - the red "o" is rendered at a much lower resolution. The stair steps are huge, while on the black they are not. There is sharp edges on the black at the expense of color fringes (as expected). Notice on the red, there is no color fringing.