Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger
Almost, except we need a picture that is not fuzzy. That makes a huge difference
|
Absolutely. Nate? ; )
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger
Edit: to further nitpick, even the fuzzy image is clearly a resolution loss of 300ppi vs 100ppi. It does no subpixel anti aliasing. There is clear big steps in the red, while the black is smoother.
|
Eh?! You see in there a loss of 9x ?! The loss below comparable to the loss above? No, I doubt that the fuzziness of the interpolated real photos could ever manage to hide a resolution loss 300→100, which is the one I showed with the "This is a string text". Maybe an equivalence of 300→173 I could consider possible. It is true that blurriness can conceal everything, but to make 300 and 100 similar I think it would have also annihilated the tinted filter texture.
Anyway: if we got better photos there would be no need to wonder and reconstruct.