Quote:
Originally Posted by MGlitch
I’m sure we’ll all miss you calling anyone who disagrees with you daft and absurd since that’s basically all your comments ever seem to amount to.
|
Except, of course, that I never called anyone daft or absurd. I just pointed out that certain statements were deserving of those epithets.
Quote:
|
You’ve been unable to back up any of your claims with anything approaching an understanding of even basic business or manufacturing sense.
|
Except that, as I clearly pointed out, I haven't been making claims about basic business or manufacturing. All I've been doing is pointing out that you are speculating.
And, in post #25, I carefully explained where you are wrong and why.
I note that you could not defend your waffle, there, limiting post #26 to ad hominems and excuses about your inability to check your posts to ensure that you've used the fairly simple quoting system properly.
Except that you can't, because your idea of how a business operates is based on pulling an idea out of thin air and then coming up with a set of speculations to support your idea, and presenting them as fact.
This is your attempt at 'education':
------------------------------------------
So here since you're daft and need things spelled out in very plain text [ad hominem attack]
Kobo finds KA1s in some storeroom in these markets [Speculation and a rather weird concept of space. 'Some storeroom in these markets? Must be a hell of big storeroom]
Kobo tests a few and they pass [Pure speculation]
Kobo sells the remainder, however a selection of these have faced battery
degradation, a selection possibly (and probably) greater than normal because of time elapsed and storage conditions [Not only have you just said that Kobo sell the ones that didn't pass, again, pure speculation.]
Some nutter finds Kobo is selling KA1s and thinks they have decided to manufacture new ones and that each and every device will be tested to arrive perfect to his door. [Ad hominem and more speculation]
------------------------------------------
So, your attempt at 'spelling things out in plain text' involves a series of speculations, ad hominem attacks, a suggestion that a storeroom is 'in' a set of markets covering thousands of square miles, and a statement that Kobo are selling the stock that failed the testing.
Of course, you'll say that these are just trivial mistakes, but the fact that, having said you'll educate someone in plain text, you can't write five lines without two glaring errors indicates that you thought processes are not the most logical and well disciplined.
The fact that you similarly couldn't write five lines without resorting to two ad hominem attacks is also significant.
Quote:
|
Enjoy your KA1. And again I hope the battery is good
|
I suspect that that is a lie.
Quote:
|
Unless that one is a daft nutter who can’t back his own claims up and can only resort to mockery to try and be right.
|
Really, for someone who is so free with using ad hominems instead of backing up his speculations, that's a perfect case of the pot calling the kettle black.