Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s
But is that more statistically significant than finding two books that didn't use <Hn> ?
Isn't the existence of multiple tools that automatically map headers into TOC entries just a coincidental fluke?
|
What?
So, Jon finding two books that use p for headings
isn't less statistically significant than a search showing that 93% of nearly 8,000 eBooks
did use headings?
???
There's nothing "coincidental" about tools using headings--that's what they are
meant to do. They are, again, hierarchal. Ever use Word? Ever use Word's built-in Outline View? (Which has existed since long before eBooks?) How does that work? By the use of heading styles, which creates a hierarchy, which you use a) for outlining and structure and b) to create--TOCs.
There's not one damned thing coincidental or flukey about it. That's akin to saying that pregnancy is a coincidental flukey outcome around sex.
Right? Or have I misunderstood your post?
Hitch