Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex2002ans
|
I agree it is a good article.
Re why Macmillan and S&S didn’t join, I wonder if it’s because the evidence of financial harm is thin enough that opinions, among their internal business analysts, vary.
One thing I would be worried about if I was a publisher — what happens if OpenLibrary starts using higher quality OCR so their eBooks are no longer such a big mess (as the lawsuit acknowledges is true now).
I think the plaintiffs might be wise to settle for OpenLibrary going back to one loan per copy and signing a pledge to never increase their scan quality.