Quote:
Originally Posted by jhowell
The regular fonts probably won't have the characters you want and I believe that the fallback is the Code2000.
|
Code 2000 covers most of Unicode 5.2, however, many glyphs don't render well. (For an example, see the attached image.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhowell
[...] I doubt that has any handling of language-specific character variants.
|
Since Traditional and Simplified Chinese characters are encoded using different codepoints, no character variant handling is required.
@Tex2002ans You also might want to check out
Noto CJK.