View Single Post
Old 05-23-2020, 03:04 PM   #15
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 80,049
Karma: 147977995
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellby View Post
There seems to be an exception for @page, but that's CSS3, and ePub 2 is CSS 2.1, as far as I remember (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-page-3/#page-properties):

The normal rules for CSS properties apply with the following exceptions:
[...]
Percentage values on the margin and padding properties are relative to the dimensions of the containing block. For right and left values, percentages are relative to the width of the containing block; for top and bottom values, percentages are relative to the height of the containing block.
Exactly. That's what I was saying. You originally said percent was based on width.Since we are talking top margin, width would have made no sense.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote