View Single Post
Old 05-04-2020, 11:56 AM   #8
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,621
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Actually, that variable is used to define a specific angle implementation (when Qt is configured to use the included Angle libraries). Thus it would actually be the same as using Qt::AA_UseOpenGLES. Your variable is how you configure Angle to use d3d9, d3d11, or warp.

Kevin's suggestion of using QT_OPENGL=software is synonymous with Qt::AA_UseSoftwareOpenGL, and how you force the use of the included software-based Mesa renderer (opengl32sw.dll).

QT_ANGLE_PLATFORM=warp will attempt to use microsoft's software based rasterizing software built into Direct3D11 and higher.

It's still worth a shot, for sure, but I just wanted to clear up the misconception that it's the same as using Qt::AA_UseSoftwareOpenGL.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote