Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomk2
Far from it. Just not young enough to have been brainwashed. It is acceptable to confine people who are healthy? Against their will? Because they might be infectious sometime in the future? And to do this indefinitely?
Every healthy person is now Typhoid Mary without proof of contagious disease? Until when?
|
Not because they will be infectious someday. Because asking people to stay at home keeps them from getting infected by those twits who are infected and don't stay home.
As a fine example, we have that 78 year old gentleman who went in to work despite being sick because "he did not want to leave his employer short-handed". His employer was shut down which might have been just slightly worse for production than if he had stayed home, three of his co-workers have died and 102 more have tested positive. As one reporter wrote: "one JBS employee told her they were asked to take off a protective face mask they were wearing, "because it could scare employees.""
In a rather morbid way, it was rather funny to see an American politician trying to use the First Amendment to the US constitution to justify not staying at home—the right of the people peaceably to assemble was being violated. As was their right to qualify for a Darwin award.
Hey,it's not as bad the massive increase in the number of calls to poison control centers after some American politician violated the old saw about it being better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt by suggesting ingesting or injecting disinfectants might be a good way to combat COVID-19.