View Single Post
Old 04-27-2020, 10:33 AM   #7
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,930
Karma: 6361444
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
An "i" tag is valid html5 and therefore valid for epub3. It even has a slightly different semantic than the "em" tag. A forign word, a ship name, etc vs just "emphasis". How on earth can Google Play Publish make such a rule. It is not part of the epub3 spec. Itunes ibooks does allow the use of both the "i" tag and the "em" tag. Sounds like the "thought police" are back in action and this time are reading your mind to determine that the "i" tag is somehow inappropriate.

I would file a bug report with Google Play publish and tell them they are neither the owner of the epub3 spec nor can they read minds to determine how the author meant to use "i" vs "em".

So silly.
KevinH is online now   Reply With Quote