Quote:
Originally Posted by phillipgessert
Grateful for this topic as for the longest time I mistakenly thought a concordance was essentially just a "dumb" index, e.g. "instances of a term" rather than a properly curated index.
|
Yes, and I
still think that, mostly. Is a concordance for a Bible, perhaps, viewed a bit differently than for your basic book?? Or..? (Not an expert in Biblical bookmaking. I know the layout and basic use, bor Bibles,
but unless I'm losing what's left of my noggin, I'm pretty sure most concordances that I've worked on, for both regular but also, legal docs/books, over the years, are pretty much just...just what they
sound like, an alpha collection of words and instances???)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
Single or double density? Hard sectored or soft sectored?
|
HA! Trick question, although maybe not here on MR. 99% of people will only have used soft-sectored, and
both single/double density, I'd hazard a guess. Hard sectored aren't going to be known to those users.
Ah, the olden days when 8" was, well...8".
(evil grin here...)
Hitch