View Single Post
Old 04-14-2020, 02:42 PM   #10
stumped
Wizard
stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.stumped ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,305
Karma: 10259306
Join Date: May 2016
Device: kobo forma, Kobo Libra, Huawei media Tab, fire HD10, PW3 HDX8.9,
[QUOTE=DuckieTigger;3976191]Did you even look at the picture in the first post? It is one picture with two devices at once. /QUOTE]

I did.
and I immediately saw that devices' settings are not the same.
So that particular picture is useless, evidentially.


I am not denying that differences can exist, I am asking if anyone has determined which components cause the variation.

And that photography can be suspect, unless you are a skilled photographer. Even side by side, one could be getting or reflecting more natural light or be more or less influenced by a flash. If camera is aimed at centre of device A, with device B off to one side, and flash is used, then device B gets far less flash light.

The most objective , trustworthy process is this: and we'd have to trust the photographer.
Take a picture of device A, then replace it with device B in exactly the same place without moving the camera and take a 2nd picture, with identical camera settings.
Then put those pictures side by side
Obviously also, screens have to have the same display, and the same number of screen changes since e-ink was last refreshed.
stumped is offline   Reply With Quote