View Single Post
Old 04-14-2020, 11:23 AM   #8
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by stumped View Post
It is surely much more likely that variation in photos is due to photography. All the devices have the same array of leds , probably from the same factory, the same firmware, and the same screen materials.

If someone actually owns several and photos them side by side, that would be evidence, but most people only own one, thus photo comparisons are suspect?

Are there any reviews which substantiate this device variation hypothesis
Did you even look at the picture in the first post? It is one picture with two devices at once. The background is pretty consistent color wise, the devices are not. Do you suggest that someone went out of their way to photoshop the picture to make both screen different?

To me that picture is proof by itself that there is variations, real variations, not imagined ones.
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote