View Single Post
Old 04-10-2020, 08:52 AM   #78
maddz
Wizard
maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,405
Karma: 30039536
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kobo Forma, Icarus, iPad Mini 2, Kobo Touch, Google Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solitaire1 View Post

Something I hadn't thought of when I initially posted on this topic is that it it would also make it easy to determine copyright for non-book publications, like newspapers and magazines. With this rule, if a magazine/newspaper was released in 1946 the entire newspaper/magazine would go into the public domain on 1 January 2048. Making death of the writer a factor in determining copyright would create the situation where some parts of a magazine/newspaper are in copyright while other parts are not.
The problem with that is reprinted content. Would the copyright run from the date of the first publication of a piece or the date of the current issue? That could get messy.
maddz is offline   Reply With Quote