Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul
Which doesn't show a lot of confidence in their legality, does it?
|
Nope.
But then, they have a history of ignoring DMCA takedown requests.
https://the-digital-reader.com/2018/...-dmca-notices/
If they truly thought they were in the right they would never take anything down. Again, they *know* they are in the wrong but count on authors not knowing of them or being unable to spend tbe *upfront* money to sue.
That they respond once in a while is because they know that sooner or later somebody will and find it safer to "humor" noise makers before the sheep wake up. And as Wikipedia's revenues quoted above show, there is good money for salaries in running non-profits on somebody else's money.
The Gates Foundation they ain't.