View Single Post
Old 03-28-2020, 06:37 PM   #14
Tex2002ans
Wizard
Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,306
Karma: 13057279
Join Date: Jul 2012
Device: Kobo Forma, Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by hobnail View Post
(I think of them as glyphs rather than characters.)
Yeah. In normal language, glyph/symbol/character get used interchangeably... in Unicode, it gets a bit more technical, so "glyph" would be the proper term for a single displayed shape.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hobnail View Post
But aren't those glyphs what's used in the output? My thinking was that when there's a sequence that can be displayed with a ligature then something happens to make the ligature appear in the output instead of the original sequence.
On more technical Glyph/Ligature discussion, see the FAQ on the Unicode.org page, "Ligatures, Digraphs, Presentation Forms vs. Plain Text", especially:

Quote:
Q: What about the “ct” ligature? Is there a character for that in Unicode?

A: No, the “ct” ligature is another example of a ligature of Latin letters commonly seen in older type styles. [...] One simply represents the character sequence <c, t> in Unicode and depends on font design and font attribute controls to determine whether the result is ligated in display (or in printing). [...]

Remember that the Unicode Standard is a character encoding standard, and is not intended to standardize ligatures or other presentation forms, or any other aspects of the details of font and glyph design. The ligatures which you can find in the Unicode Standard are compatibility encodings only—and are not meant to set a precedent requiring the encoding of all ligatures as characters.
And in OpenType itself, I Love Typography's, "An Introduction to OpenType Substitution Features" goes into some of the nitty gritty of how alternates/ligatures work.

Last edited by Tex2002ans; 03-29-2020 at 12:13 AM.
Tex2002ans is offline   Reply With Quote