View Single Post
Old 03-05-2020, 11:55 AM   #7
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,784
Karma: 169712580
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
Netflex is not profitable and is a one trick pony. They don't have the long term resources to compete with Amazon and Disney.

My point is that video streaming is now a crowded market and only companies that have big alternate resources and/or content (Amazon, Disney etc) will survive.
The last time I looked at NetFlix's financials, for 2019, their gross revenue was shown as ~$29 billion (North American billion so 9 zeros) with a gross profit of ~$7.7 billion and a net income of ~1.9 billion. You can check at Netflix Financial Statements 2005-2020 | NFLX for more information.

I will have to agree that going forward, NetFlix may be in for trouble considering the number of well-funded and stocked with content competitors joining the market. With the continuing fragmentation in the streaming market, most consumers are going to be looking at using 4 or more streaming services to obtain the same content they are currently enjoying.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote