View Single Post
Old 02-29-2020, 06:47 PM   #33472
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetterRed View Post
Organisations that show ads when I'm logged into their sites using a paid subscription account irritate me. IMO I shouldn't need an ad-blocker turned on to avoid their ads, they already got my money - example: The New York Times.
How much more would you be willing to pay for a subscription to get an ad free experience?

The NYT is simply an example of a problem affecting newspapers and consumer magazines in general. The cost of a copy purchased at a newsstand, or via a subscription, doesn't even cover the direct cost of producing the publication. Things like the salaries of the folks working on it and making actual money for the publisher come from advertising. Eliminate ads, and you eliminate the publication. It's simply not possible for the NYT or pretty much anyone else to charge enough for a subscription to dispense with ads.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote