View Single Post
Old 02-22-2020, 06:14 PM   #15
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,950
Karma: 169810634
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by stumped View Post
ok but bottom line is customer buys a 1TB drive, installs it, windows tells them they have ~930Mb, customer feels ripped off, writes a bad review or send it back...

the larger the drive, the more shocking that headline 8% discrepancy looks.

If kobo use the same measurements ( & I cant be bothered to check) , an empty 8GB Forma will actually be 7.3 GB, and that's before firmware etc takes its chunk
8%? That would give a 920GB drive for a drive that was exactly 1,000,000,000,000 bytes of raw storage. The discrepancy also gets worse as you use larger drive size increments. KB vs KiB is 2.3%, MB vs. MiB is 4.6%, GB vs GiB is 6.9%, TB vs Tib is 9.1%, etc.

For a Forma, 7.45GB of raw storage—assuming the empty disk was exactly 8,000,000,000 bytes—minus the hidden partitions and bits and bobs that don't fit into the partitioning scheme comes close to the 6.73GB I see as the drive size.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote