View Single Post
Old 02-19-2020, 04:19 PM   #20
NiLuJe
BLAM!
NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NiLuJe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NiLuJe's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,506
Karma: 26047202
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Paris, France
Device: Kindle 2i, 3g, 4, 5w, PW, PW2, PW5; Kobo H2O, Forma, Elipsa, Sage, C2E
@Alborghetti: It has nothing to do with screen technology (and neither will the Kindle's own option).

Fire up your favorite image editing program, find a Contrast slider, play with the slider. That's pretty much the exact same thing.

You can do some slightly specialized trickery with a font rendering engine (e.g., FreeType's stem darkening feature), but the idea is basically the same: more darker pixels than what the standard AA grayscale rasterizer ends up with.

No-one's magically making eInk particles darker and/or the background whiter.

EDIT: CRe's implementation predates's FT stem-darkening feature (by, like, a lot . And gamma correction on FT's buffers is actually always a good idea anyway), and appears to be implemented via a variable gamma ramp LUT. So, quite literally making existing pixels darker, without actually affecting the outline rasterization directly.

Last edited by NiLuJe; 02-19-2020 at 04:30 PM.
NiLuJe is offline   Reply With Quote