View Single Post
Old 02-19-2020, 02:35 PM   #47
Pyjam
Zealot
Pyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead communityPyjam has become a pillar of the MobileRead community
 
Posts: 143
Karma: 15920
Join Date: Aug 2015
Device: Kindle Voyage
I'll try it if you give me a link, so I'll be sure to use the right version.
That said, I don't want a reduced line height. On the contrary, I edit all my books to augment the line height to my liking.
I'm not interested by more text per screen page, really not. My Oasis keeps the same thickness whatever the number of screen pages for a book. ;0)
Thanks for your answer, anyway.

Edit: I've just tried v1.1 from here:
https://www.mobileread.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=184056
I've already tried it in the past. I'm sorry but I prefer Veleka for my Oasis.
ChareInk is too bold and the line height is too small for my eyes.
The text seems too compressed for my liking.
I don't understand your comment about kerning as there is no kerning issue with the version of Veleka I'm using.

Edit 2: I've compared a word starting by "Ve…". The spacing is the same with both Veleka and ChareInk.

Edit 3:
I've taken two screenshots. Under close examination, I can see some subtle difference in the spacing between both fonts. But not where expected. I won't say there is no kerning at all.

Eventually – for my eyes – Veleka with boldness set to 1 works better. ChareInk at level 0 isn't bold enough, and at level 1 it's already too bold.

Anyway, again, thanks for your suggestion.

Last edited by Pyjam; 02-19-2020 at 04:18 PM.
Pyjam is offline   Reply With Quote