View Single Post
Old 02-16-2020, 05:20 PM   #25
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,368
Karma: 235205657
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One, PW4, PW5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria View Post
issybird I’m sorry to read you lost an old favourite! It makes we wish we hadn’t chosen the book.
Never be sorry a book’s been chosen! I’m a big girl and if I can’t enjoy a book in one way, I can find another.

Quote:
I feel the same way about how Montgomery developed Anne’s story in later books. I read the first three books at aged 10 & 11, and loved them. I later read the rest of the series as a teenager, and was very disappointed. She just didn’t seem like Anne at all.
I know! All that drive and ambition and talent evanesced. As has been said above, the Emily books are superior. In addition to featuring a grittier heroine, they didn’t go beyond their sell-by date. Three told the story.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookpossum View Post

ETA I crossed with your post issybird, so thanks for those reminders. I hadn’t picked up that they referred to Acadians I suppose.
Why should you have? They were written and treated as underlings, so it’s as well they were marginal to the book and easy to overlook.
issybird is online now   Reply With Quote