View Single Post
Old 02-12-2020, 11:16 AM   #12
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,614
Karma: 204624552
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
@KevinH: got a spur-of-the-moment (not-very-well-thought-out) what-if for you.

In my mind, there is no need to be able to reorder any tab other than the one that is currently active. If one had to first activate a tab and then grab it again in order to move it in relation to the others, this whole twitchy inactive tabs thing wouldn't be an issue.

Since we already subclass QTabBar and reimplement a few things, is there any way could reimplement something that could prevent moves for any tab that wasn't already active when first clicked?

I know that's vague as heck, but I don't have any of Qt's QTabBar source in front of me.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote