View Single Post
Old 01-27-2020, 08:10 PM   #83
jhowell
Grand Sorcerer
jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jhowell's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,094
Karma: 92190113
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Device: Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argon View Post
my Kindle with A Fire Upon the Deep—which I'm using as a reference standard, whose style sheet says 5%
I took a look at the free sample available on Amazon for A Fire Upon the Deep.

It is coded with text-indent:5%, but it also has a body style of margin-right:25px, which slightly reduces the overall page width. Because of that, for this book the KFX text-indent becomes 1.55em instead of 1.6em.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argon View Post
A Fire Upon the Deep's doesn't look like 1.6em to me.
I was able to duplicate your photo on my Kindle using a font size of 1.

I used a screenshot from my Kindle Oasis 2 (touch opposite corners to generate) with a test book containing m-dashes and determined that at size 1, 1em = 29px on my screen.

A text-indent of 1.55em should be 45px and that is what I measured in for A Fire Upon the Deep. So it is working as expected for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argon View Post
The Wandering Inn's indentation looks bigger to me
The Wandering Inn indent (1.6em) should look slightly larger than A Fire Upon the Deep (1.55em). It is hard to judge from photographs.
jhowell is online now   Reply With Quote