Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
Did you read the quotes or follow the links?
YouTube *does* police uploads.
With a sledgehammer.
Hence the false positives vastly outnumbering the true violators.
(Look at the examples. White noise gets flagged.)
|
What they are doing is matching to existing YouTube videos.
Which by definition will never prevent violations for works that the copyright owner doesn't want uploaded to YouTube.
Quote:
|
The issue isn't will, it is technical and economic: Google and the other "eeevile" big tech companies can afford to implement filters but the tech isn't anywhere near good enough, at any price, to be precise and accurate.
|
Amazon already have the code and process in place to identify copyright violations by streamers. They already
do identify them. But all they do with the information is mute VODs. They could, right now, force their streamers to stop playing copyright music or lose their accounts. They don't, because noone is forcing them to, and there is no financial benefit to doing so.
Quote:
|
These lobbyist-driven political initiatives aren't driven by a desire to help consumers or creators, only to satisfy the demands of the politically connected middleman multinationals.
|
Exactly the same is true for Google's lobbying against them.