[tubemonkey]

Originally Posted by murraypaul

The link in the article to the actual bill times out (https://house.mo.gov/billtracking/bi.../4634H.01I.pdf), but is available through Google's caching: https://webcache.googleusercontent.c.../4634H.01I.pdf
Page 3, line 41.

Thanks, I missed the link. They deliberately left those two words out and that changes my stance in how I would criticize the bill. I'm still against it, but no longer view it as an outright ban; it's a partial ban that denies parents the right to choose what their children should be exposed to.