Thread: MO Bill Proposes Parental Review Board for “Age-Inappropriate” Material
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2020, 08:37 AM   #30
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
Where did you find the "by minors" bit? I didn't see it in the article and I based my comments on what the article said.

If the Library Journal failed to included those two words, then count me in the group that says they did it deliberately in order create sympathy for their point of view. They're to be condemned for their deceit.
The link in the article to the actual bill times out (https://house.mo.gov/billtracking/bi.../4634H.01I.pdf), but is available through Google's caching: https://webcache.googleusercontent.c.../4634H.01I.pdf
Page 3, line 41.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote