Quote:
Originally Posted by jj2me
Agenda? What the heck? An agenda about e-reader lighting? Weird.
Like you couldn't tell I simply had a question directed to someone who knows more than I, by, for example, that it ended in a question mark?
Nowhere did I say that LCDs are bad for eye health. To the contrary, I'm the poster child for LCDs not harming eyes, having started using CRTs extensively at work in the '70s, and still don't wear glasses.
Maybe, just maybe, I was interested in what someone more knowledgeable considers best practices for reading. Many of us like to know best practices (e.g., the popularity of cooking and home repair TV shows), even if we personally never get around to actually live up to them.
|
I suggest that you calm down before you have an apoplexy.
You said to the other poster:
I was about to give my worthless anecdote before I came upon your posts (I had no idea of this science). - bolding added by me.
I was pointing out that what you referred to as being science was not science at all, but rather just someone's mangling of "science"; and I gave a brief introductory explanation why that was so.
Perhaps someone debunking the "science" did not meet your agenda, and hence your anger. Good luck, I'll leave you to it.