View Single Post
Old 01-14-2020, 08:32 AM   #97
Tokei
Member
Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tokei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 19
Karma: 2075226
Join Date: Apr 2019
Device: Kobo Forma
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeera View Post
The Forma is 1000 Hz. What you have said does not support your previous assertion of "The studies that have been discussed in this thread showed that people can have adverse effects even with higher refresh rates than the ones used by the Forma."
The IEEE recommendation discussed in the link that I quoted earlier is based on a meta-study. Several studies found negative effects also above 1kzh, which explains the second quote I used that recommends a frequency above 3khz.

The same meta study is also used in a presentation from the US Department of Energy you can find here:
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/fi...htfair2015.pdf

On slide 18 you can see the recommended frequency based on the modulation. The curve was plotted along the various studies looked at with a dot representing a study result. There are studies that found effects well beyond 1Khz.

Anyway, this is just retreading a prior discussion, so I leave it at that.
Tokei is offline   Reply With Quote